mBit License and Operator History

The current mBit operator is Scores55 Tech B.V.

Since 16 July 2024, mBit has been operated by Scores55 Tech B.V., registration number 162990, in Willemstad, Curaçao. The current licence number is OGL/2024/1307/0748, issued under the Curaçao Gaming Authority / Gaming Control Board framework.

• Current operatorScores55 Tech B.V.
• Current since16 July 2024
• Registration number162990
• JurisdictionCuraçao
• LicenceOGL/2024/1307/0748

The licence identifies the operator and the regulatory framework attached to the current mBit domain. It does not determine whether gambling is lawful for a particular player. Local rules can differ by country, so the relevant question for an individual user is whether online gambling is permitted where that person lives and what consumer remedies exist there.

The operational side of a dispute often intersects with other parts of the account. Keep the payment record and transaction IDs that show what moved on-chain, and retain any account-verification requests described in the account and KYC guide.

mBit has moved through three operating companies since 2014

mBit launched in 2014 under Direx N.V. on the SoftSwiss platform. The operation moved to Dama N.V. around 2019/2020, and the current Scores55 Tech B.V. period began on 16 July 2024. The Dama period used historical licence OGL/2023/174/0082 before the current licence attached to Scores55 Tech B.V.

This chronology matters because older reviews can still name Dama N.V. as the operator. That is historical context rather than the current corporate position. For a complaint or formal query, use the operator and licence details that apply to the period in which the disputed activity occurred.

Offshore regulation changes the dispute path

mBit’s current regulatory framework is Curaçao-based rather than tied to a national gambling authority in each player’s home country. For an international reader, that creates a practical distinction between the casino’s licensing framework and any local protections that might exist where the player lives.

If a dispute cannot be resolved directly with the operator, there may be less familiar local recourse than a player would have with a casino licensed by that player’s own national regulator. The exact legal position depends on the player’s country, so local law should be checked separately rather than inferred from the casino’s offshore licence.

Independent trust signals add context beyond the licence

Casino Guru currently lists mBit with a 9.2 Safety Index, described there as “Very high.” Its terms section is rated “Mostly fair” and shows one issue concerning a dormant-account rule that can void a balance after a period of inactivity. That third-party assessment is separate from the casino’s regulatory licence.

AskGamblers also carries an mBit profile that includes player feedback and complaint records. Broader review coverage describes a long operating history and complaints that are largely closed after operator explanations. Those signals are useful when read alongside the operator timeline, because the substance of a complaint matters more than a raw count.

Casino Guru

Safety Index 9.2, labelled “Very high”; terms rated “Mostly fair,” with one dormant-account issue flagged.

AskGamblers

Maintains an mBit profile with player-review and complaint context.

Operating record

The mBit brand has been active since 2014 across successive operators.

These are not interchangeable signals. A licence identifies the regulated operator; a terms review looks at contract language; complaint histories show how disputes are handled in practice. Read them as separate evidence streams rather than combining them into a single homemade safety score.

A strong dispute file starts before you contact support

For crypto gambling, payment evidence is unusually concrete because on-chain transactions produce transaction IDs and timestamps. That does not settle a dispute by itself, but it can establish when and where funds moved. Combine blockchain evidence with account records and the terms that applied at the time.

1. Record the transaction. Keep the transaction ID, asset, amount, destination address and timestamp for the deposit or withdrawal in question.
2. Save the account state. Capture the cashier state, balance state and any verification request relevant to the disputed withdrawal or account action.
3. Preserve the applicable terms. Keep the bonus, withdrawal or account rules that governed the transaction rather than relying on a later version.
4. Write a short chronology. List what happened in date order, including support contacts and responses. A concise sequence is easier to review than a folder of unsorted account images.
5. Escalate with the correct operator details. For current activity, use Scores55 Tech B.V. and licence OGL/2024/1307/0748 as the regulatory reference.
6. Check local remedies separately. Your country may impose its own gambling restrictions or provide consumer channels that are independent of the casino’s offshore framework.

If the dispute concerns a missing or delayed transfer, the mBit payments reference helps separate network fees, known minimums and reported withdrawal timing. If it concerns game access or a provider session, the games guide provides the relevant product context without mixing it with regulatory claims.

Questions about the mBit licence